Mar 31, 2005, 09:35 PM // 21:35 | #1 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
how much like diablo2??
I dunno if this is asked a lot, but how much like Diablo 2 is this game?
|
Mar 31, 2005, 09:42 PM // 21:42 | #2 |
Krytan Explorer
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Austin
|
both games have hit points and mana
other than that they're different |
Mar 31, 2005, 09:45 PM // 21:45 | #3 |
Elite Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Beguine Guild [BGN]
|
Take Diablo II, update the graphics, move the chat rooms in-game, multiply the skills you can learn by a factor of five, actually balance the game and remove the ridiculous items, and generally make the game much, much larger (more quests, bigger areas, more missions), and you'd turn Diablo II into something similar to GW. Except not as good, as I've failed to list a whole host of other improvements (too many to list).
I think it's fair to say, though, they've got a lot in common. They're both essentially action RPGs. I tend to think of GW as the bastard love-child of Diablo II and Magic: the Gathering... |
Mar 31, 2005, 09:47 PM // 21:47 | #4 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
So, why should i stop playing WoW for this game? Wont there be hacks like in diablo1?
|
Mar 31, 2005, 09:50 PM // 21:50 | #5 |
Lion's Arch Merchant
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: TX
|
they are preventing hacks by not actually having the game on your computer, all the content is streamed to you through the network while you play... another reason is cause WoW = $180 per year
|
Mar 31, 2005, 09:51 PM // 21:51 | #6 | |
Academy Page
Join Date: Mar 2005
Guild: Doom Brigade
|
Quote:
From all the info. that was kindly provided, where do you get that assumption? |
|
Mar 31, 2005, 09:52 PM // 21:52 | #7 | ||
Elite Guru
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Minnesota
Guild: Beguine Guild [BGN]
|
Quote:
Quote:
Diablo was far more susceptible to hacks than GW will be. For that matter, WoW is far more susceptible to hacks than GW will be... |
||
Mar 31, 2005, 10:27 PM // 22:27 | #8 |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
What about character models? The video I just watched, everybody looked the same (blue capes). I'd like to look different from someone else.
|
Mar 31, 2005, 10:40 PM // 22:40 | #9 |
Ascalonian Squire
Join Date: Feb 2005
Guild: Imperial Militia
Profession: W/R
|
your character is made the way you want him/her to look like. if everyone was wearing a blue cape, then it was a certian guild or just a group of players that person was playing with (that was taking the video). as far a body build...... they are all the same for each class i.e. all warriors body's look the same, all necro's body's look the same, ect., ect. the change is the facial features, skin, size, hair and the like that you make to suit you.
|
Mar 31, 2005, 11:01 PM // 23:01 | #10 | |
Academy Page
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Camelot
|
Quote:
|
|
Apr 01, 2005, 01:01 AM // 01:01 | #11 |
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: Order of the Sanguine Dragon [OSD]
Profession: E/Mo
|
With a substantial number of the developers being ex diablo 2 and battlenet devs you could think of this game as Diablo 3 really.
Of course, just like Diablo 2 was so much better than Diablo, Guild Wars is miles away from Diablo 2. |
Apr 01, 2005, 01:35 AM // 01:35 | #12 | |
Sig Fairy
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Once upon a time..
|
Quote:
And by a "new standard," I mean the dedication to reduce grind, instead of promoting it as the primary form of MMO gaming existence, etc. Let's see Guild Wars on its own merit. Like Dreamsmith said, you can play WoW, EQ, etc, to your heart's content, and still play GW. They are two very different types of games, with two very different aims in what they want to deliver to their audience. To me, terming it "Diablo 3" is not only a step backwards, but would also be a slight disparagement of what the devs are trying to accomplish with GW. They're trying to do something new and staggering in this industry.. not merely picking up the scattered fame trails of old gaming giants from the past by actually being a semi-look alike clone with better graphics. Nicknaming it "Diablo 3" relegates it back to that status, instead of giving it its own place at the forefront. And indeed, if you are looking for a Diablo 3, you'll be severely disappointed. This game will not be for you. My same old argument also lies here. Rip off those old preconceptions, and as I've said before, stop thinking of what you're *used* to in a game, but rather what you want. And, if Guild Wars happens to be what you want, then like many of us, you'll be very very happy, as it's definitely the only one of its kind. |
|
Apr 01, 2005, 02:07 AM // 02:07 | #13 |
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Mar 2005
|
I've said it once and I'll say it again. It's amazing what kind of rumors a game with no monthly fee can generate.
|
Apr 01, 2005, 07:01 AM // 07:01 | #14 | |
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: Order of the Sanguine Dragon [OSD]
Profession: E/Mo
|
Quote:
|
|
Apr 01, 2005, 07:06 AM // 07:06 | #15 | |
Desert Nomad
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Seattle, Washington
Profession: R/E
|
Quote:
|
|
Apr 01, 2005, 07:19 AM // 07:19 | #16 |
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: No Idea
|
They both only have combat as a main source of entertainment.
|
Apr 01, 2005, 09:07 AM // 09:07 | #17 | |
Pre-Searing Cadet
Join Date: Apr 2005
|
Quote:
Let's just put it this way it is another ground breaking MMORPG by the creators of BattleNet and D1 and D2.... Nuff said?! Well if it is not it has made me a die hard diablo2 fan not even play anymore. You get good trade and random drops that can actually be good. Graphics are 1000x better. No use of pots in PvP cuz monks do the healing. 8 vs 8 and 4 vs 4 @.@. The list goes on and on. |
|
Apr 01, 2005, 06:22 PM // 18:22 | #18 | |
Frost Gate Guardian
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA Custom Title: Ninja Filmmaker
Guild: Agony Guild [Agny]
Profession: W/Mo
|
Quote:
Napster: "Hello, sir, and welcome to the new and improved Napster!" Consumer: "Okay, what's changed?" Napster: "Well, it's no longer free, you're limited in all-around selection, and we get to watch your every action using the software...but other than that it's the same!" Consumer: "So it's nothing like the rebel software it once was and has become a corporate RED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GORED ENGINE GO. I see." Granted, this is more related to P2P issues and not gaming, but it does address the concept I'm after: that which is similar is not identical. I'm sure you can think of other analogies if you're willing to open your mind to the fact that you're insulting the game by not treating it like the original MMO title it is. EDIT: It's been brought to my attention you've not even played the game and yet you're making such a grandiose and erroneous statement about it? -- Scaper-X Last edited by Scaper-X; Apr 01, 2005 at 06:26 PM // 18:26.. Reason: Addition |
|
Apr 01, 2005, 10:44 PM // 22:44 | #19 | |
Jungle Guide
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Guild: Order of the Sanguine Dragon [OSD]
Profession: E/Mo
|
Quote:
You're wrong though, I have played it, just not recently. |
|
Apr 01, 2005, 11:02 PM // 23:02 | #20 |
Wilds Pathfinder
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Guild: Confusion in The Ranks[tArD]
Profession: Mo/W
|
well one things for sure guildwars i alot alot alot lot lot lot forever better than d2 no matter how u compare it
-well unless ur a blood fanatic |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:18 AM // 10:18.
|